Peer Review History: Health Status and Demographic Characteristics of Patients Attending a Primary Care Unit in Mexico City: A Descriptive Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA And University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Tamilselvan, Nehru College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) David Otieno Odongo, Masinde Muliro University of  Science and Technology, Kenya.

(3) Sara Shahid, Lahore University of Biological & Applied Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asma Ejaz, Australia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T. Tamilselvan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Otieno Odongo, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sara Shahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Compost Biomass Using Mango (Mangifera indica) Combined with Popularized Mineral Manure on Soil Chemical Parameters and Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Western Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jakub Kostecki, Assistant Professor, University of Zielona Góra, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Abraham E. Sunday, Akwa Ibom State University, Nigeria.

(2) Karel Iaroslav Lato, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timişoara, Romania.

(3) Salahaddin Abdulqadir Aziz, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abraham E. Sunday, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karel Iaroslav Lato, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Salahaddin Abdulqadir Aziz, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Technical Options for Body Weight Estimation: Prediction of Body Weights of Indigenous Sheep Populations from Their Linear Body Measurements

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ng Zhi Xiang, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Adil Uztemur, Bursa Uludag University, Turkiye.

(2) Iliya Mallam, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adil Uztemur, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iliya Mallam, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Social Security Policy in Tanzania: A Review of Benefits, Challenges and Effectiveness

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lok Raj Sharma, Makawanpur Multiple Campus, Nepal.

(2) Syazliyati Ibrahim, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

(3) S.S.Jeyaraj, Sino-British College (Partnership program with Staffordshire University, UK) Guangxi Minzu University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yao Cebastien Komenan, Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lok Raj Sharma, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syazliyati Ibrahim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.S.Jeyaraj, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Impact of Organizational Structure on the Role of Local Government Communication Officers in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepti Pandey, MIT Sloan School of Management, USA.

(2) Wazir Arif Hussain, Graduate School of Public Policy, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepti Pandey, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wazir Arif Hussain, Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quantifying Response of Sesame (Sesame indicum L.) to Dose and Time of Nitrogen Application Under Irrigated Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Assistant Professor , Department of plant production and protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Nirbhay Kumar Singh, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yasir Ajeej Tamboli, Jaipur National University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G. Srinivasan, India.

(2) Mahadi Hasan Monshi, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nirbhay Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yasir Ajeej Tamboli, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Soil Amendments and Biofertilizers on Pisum sativum L. in Sandy Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Institute of Forage Crops, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Che Jane Nchangnwi, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naziya Banu, University of Mysore, India.

(2) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Che Jane Nchangnwi, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Potential of Algal Consortium as an Innovative and Effective Biofertilizer for Sustainable Agriculture in India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelgawad Y. Elsadany, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Gopa Shome, Chandernagore College, India.

(3) P. Dheivanai, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdelgawad Y. Elsadany, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gopa Shome, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Dheivanai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Results of Surgical Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures: About 100 Cases

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Midhun Krishnan, Associate Consultant, SK Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Muhammad Tayyab Hassan, Dar As Sihha Medical Center, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Seema Shantilal Pendharkar, Csmss Dental College And Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Muhammad Tayyab Hassan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seema Shantilal Pendharkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Lactifluus vellereus

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu Ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpa Sood, MCM DAV College, India.

(2) Ajay Kumar, Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zakaria Ahmed, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shilpa Sood, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA