Peer Review History: Broccoli in Nutraceutical Development: Health Benefits, Bioactive Compounds, and Sustainable Applications Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(2) Moksharthi Sharma, J.L.N. Medical College, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Omar Hussein Ahmed, Tikrit University College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moksharthi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on the Phytochemistry, Pharmacological Properties, and Clinical Efficacy of Garcinia gummi-gutta (Malabar Tamarind)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashurt Singhal, Vivekanada Global University, India.

(2) Relwende Justin Ouedraogo, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) James Aboko, Clemson University, USA.

(2) Gabriella Chandrakirana Krisnamurti, King Mongkut University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashurt Singhal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Relwende Justin Ouedraogo, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Androgenic Responses in Tropical Genotypes of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kinjal Mondal, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture And Technology, India.

(2) Soumya Patel, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kinjal Mondal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumya Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Organic Nutrient Sources on Soil Nutrient Level in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamalkant Yadav, Galgotias University, India.

(2) Asrat Mekonnen, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamalkant Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asrat Mekonnen, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Complex Interplay of Cardiac, Hepatic, and Renal Dysfunction in a Patient with Extra-hepatic Portal Vein Obstruction and Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Martín del Olmo, Medina del Campo Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Oğuz Öztürk, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Turkey.

(2) Sidra Naz, The University of Texas, United States.

(3) Bhaskar Pandey, Breach Candy Hospital Trust, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oğuz Öztürk, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sidra Naz, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bhaskar Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Wide-band Tracheids and Equisetum Sporangial Lining Cells: Similar Only in Function and Not by Evolutionary Origins

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Sharma, Jai Narain Vyas University, India.

(2) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review of Plastic Threat to Environment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and HOD, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Flavia Massuga, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Brazil.

(2) Pushpanjali Singh, School of Management Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Laras Finesha Melania, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

(2) Chinwe Joan Ogu, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria.

(3) Tatnkam Ernest Jefferson, UPES, India.

(4) Md. Mahmudur Rahman, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Bangladesh.

(5) Shahina NN, ICFRE-RFRI, India.

(6) Siti Hasnah Binti Kamarudin, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam, Malaysia.

(7) Nayer Sultana, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Flavia Massuga, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pushpanjali Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review of Omics Technologies in Seafood Safety and Quality Control: Integrating Modern Approaches with Traditional Practices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Hodhodi, University of Guilan, Iran.

(2) Shahid Gul, ICAR – Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alireza Hodhodi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahid Gul, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Use of Medicinal Plants and Phytotherapy in the Konjuh Mountain of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Debosree Ghosh, Government General Degree College, India.

(2) Yuhlung Cheithou Charles, Manipur International University, India.

(3) Nithya Annie Thomas, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debosree Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yuhlung Cheithou Charles, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nithya Annie Thomas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Multifaceted Clitoria ternatea (Aparajita): A Review of Its Phytochemistry, Medicinal Uses and Commercial Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Henrik Balslev, Aarhus University, Denmark.

(2) Neelima Yadav, Dr. C.V. Raman University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Himanshu Singh, DR. A P J Abdul Kalam University, India.

(2) V. Rama Rao, CCRAS-Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(3) Sarika Nigam, ABESIT, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Henrik Balslev, Denmark) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neelima Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA