Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Alterations in Haematological Parameters of Cervical Cancer Subjects in Port Harcourt

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, Assistant Professor, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Nicolae Bacalbasa, Carol Davila Univeristy of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) T.M.Vijayalakshmi, University of Madras, India.

(3) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamdev Sethy, OUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nicolae Bacalbasa, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.M.Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dumitru Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Growth and Nutrient Use Efficiency in Potato (cv. Kufri Pushkar) through Nano Urea and Zinc Sulfate Application in Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Husam Mohammed Muhi, University of Diyala, Iraq.

(2) Suhail Quyoom Wani, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Husam Mohammed Muhi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suhail Quyoom Wani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Alternative Tillage Practices on Potato Growth and Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, Assistant Professor, MS Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Simon Alina, Agricultural Research and Development Station, Romania.

(2) Harmanpreet Singh, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Simon Alina, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harmanpreet Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of INM on Yield, Quality of Potato and Soil Status

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Anas, The University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Tarekegn Keriso Menisho, South Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Anas, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tarekegn Keriso Menisho, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of the Seasons on the Evolution of Tomato-infecting Geminivirus and Identification of Plant Reservoirs Harboring Geminivirus in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Rodolfo Torres De Los Santos, Universidad Autonoma De Tamaulipas, Mexico.

(2) Arooj Fatima, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rodolfo Torres De Los Santos, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arooj Fatima, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Yellow Mosaic Disease in Soybean

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Montaser F. Abdel-Monaim, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Hayam S. Abdelkader, Plant Pathology Research Institute, ARC, Egypt.

(2) Eman Ibrahim El-Sayed Abdel-Wahab, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Shivcharan Meena, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hayam S. Abdelkader, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eman Ibrahim El-Sayed Abdel-Wahab, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shivcharan Meena, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Yield of Indian Mustard as Affected by Integrated Nutrient Management under Doon Valley Condition of Uttarakhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Lisetskii Fedo, Belgorod State National Research University, Russia.

(2) Sontara Kalita, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lisetskii Fedo, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sontara Kalita, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Time of Foliar Application of Different Bio-stimulants on Growth, Yield and Economics of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Montaser F. Abdel-Monaim, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdus Salam, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Radka Bozhinova, Agricultural Academy, Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed A. El-Khateeb, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Ashraf Ahmed Mohamed Habib, Desert Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdus Salam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radka Bozhinova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Efficacy of Selected Chemicals and Bio-pesticides Against Gram Pod Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Manasij Das, Seacom Skills University, India.

(2) Rupak Kumar Nath, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Maddheshiya, IFTM University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manasij Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rupak Kumar Nath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preoperatively Manifestations as Univesicular Mass-like Lesion and Postoperatively as a Multivesicular Lesion with Multiple Daughter Cysts: A Very Rare Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jurij Janez, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mayank Rajawat, India.

(2) Mojtaba Esmailpour Roshan, Islamic Azad University of Garmsar, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mayank Rajawat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mojtaba Esmailpour Roshan, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA