Peer Review History: A Study on Cultivation and Marketing of Organic and Conventional Vegetables in the Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Udaykumar, UAS , India.

(2) S. Ravichandran, ICAR-NAARM, India.

(3) Praveen Dukpa, ST Joseph University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Udaykumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Ravichandran, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Praveen Dukpa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield and Economics as Influenced by Irrigation and Weed Management Practices in Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Professor, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nida Tabassum Khan, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

(3) Josiane Pinheiro Farias, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nida Tabassum Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Josiane Pinheiro Farias, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Affecting Technological Stress among Public School Teachers during COVID-19 Pandemic

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Lucian Lupu-Dima, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Joseph Sunday Adegboro, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria.

(3) Ana Claudia Tenor, Brazil.

(4) Aravind B R, Kalasalingam Academy of Research & Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Hassan Abdel Rahman Ibrahim, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Ivy H. Casupanan, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lucian Lupu-Dima, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Joseph Sunday Adegboro, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ana Claudia Tenor, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Aravind B R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints Faced by Rice Growers in Cauvery Delta Zone of Tamil Nadu in Cultivation of TNAU Modern Rice Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) E S Munasinghe, Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) Abdu Omran Mohamed, National  Research  Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Sharma, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (E S Munasinghe, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdu Omran Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Farmers’ Use Efficiency of Soil Health Card in Rangareddy District of Telangana State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo Figueiredo, Brasil.

(2) Arup Barman, Assam University, India.

(3) J. B. Kathiriya, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eduardo Figueiredo, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arup Barman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (J. B. Kathiriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Opioid Sparing Analgesia for Surgical Procedure of Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Order to Enhance Recovery and Better Surgical Outcomes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman’s University, College of Business, USA.

(2) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Nebras Rada Mohammed, Al-Turath University College, Iraq.

(2) Nelson Hendler, University of Maryland School of Dental Surgery, USA.

(3) Ramazan Karabulut, Gazi University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akshat Gargya, University of Vermont Medical Center, United States of America.

(2) Belgin Akan, Health Sciences University, Turkey.

(3) Irene Scagnol, Energy FCBHealth, Italy.

(4) Sreekar Agumbe Pai, Ramaiah Medical College, India.

(5) Sunita Ojha, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital and Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nebras Rada Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nelson Hendler, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ramazan Karabulut, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Requirement of Selected Crops for Sangareddy District of Telangana Using CROPWAT 8.0

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Professor, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, India.

(2) Mohammed Mamodu Maina, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Nuri Öner, Çankırı Karatekin University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Justin R Nayagam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammed Mamodu Maina, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field Validation on Incorporation of Rice Husk Biochar and Paddy Straw Compost on Crop Attributes and Soil Properties in Rice Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Lusi Herawati Suryaningrum, National Research and Innovation Agency, Republic of Indonesia.

(2) Raheel Muzzammel, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marco Aurélio Kondracki de Alcântara, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Felix Uba, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Ghana.

(3) Himanshu Dehra, American Institute-Industry Forum on Energy, Canada.

(4) Mandadapu.S.V.K.V.Prasad, Swarnandhra College of Engineering & Technology, India.

(5) Syed Jamal, University of Arkansas, US.

(6) Vivekpuri G Goswami, Org Engitech Limited, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lusi Herawati Suryaningrum, Republic of Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Raheel Muzzammel, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biochar Production Technologies from Agricultural Waste, Its Utilization in Agriculture and Current Global Biochar Market: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anthony R. Lupo, Professor, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aoudjit Lamine, Algeria.

(2) Saif Ali Kadhim, University of Technology, Iraq.

(3) James Burke, University of Arkansas, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Edwin M. Puhagan, Tawi-Tawi Regional Agricultural College, Philippines.

(2) G. Kranthi Kumar, Maris Stella College, India.

(3) M.R. Suchitra, Sastra University, India.

(4) Ng Chuck Chuan, Xiamen University Malaysia, Malaysia.

(5) Shambhoo Prasad, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(6) Sunil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aoudjit Lamine, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Saif Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (James Burke, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Field Water Tube based Irrigation and Split Application of Nutrients on Yield and Water Productivity (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ines Gasmi, Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, Tunisia.

(2) Almoataz Bellah Ali El-Mouhamady, Biotechnology Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ines Gasmi, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Almoataz Bellah Ali El-Mouhamady, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA