Peer Review History: A Giant Fecolith in Pelvic Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Georgios Tsoulfas, Associate Professor, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(2) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Hüseyin Kılavuz, University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Turkiye.

(2) Ramazan Karabulut, Gazi University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hüseyin Kılavuz, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramazan Karabulut, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Hüseyin Kılavuz, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Ramazan Karabulut, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Management of Agrifood Systems: Interdisciplinary Workshop as a Learning Tool in Bioresource Technology in secondary and technical education in Agriculture at ECIT Riachão do Poço, Paraiba, Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Danmaigoro Aliyu, Adamu Augie College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Amr Toony Ali Tosson Al-Kardousi, Tanta University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Danmaigoro Aliyu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amr Toony Ali Tosson Al-Kardousi, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial Succession and Effect of Fermentation on the Proximate Composition of Sweet Potato Tubers, Leaves and Vines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Aabsheen Saba Khanam, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Basavaraj S Hunasagi, BLDDEA’s SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Center, India.

(3) P. Sivagurunathan, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aabsheen Saba Khanam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basavaraj S Hunasagi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Sivagurunathan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Nutritional Assessment of Ginger Candy Supplemented with Beetroot Pomace Powder

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chunhua Zhou, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Humaira Ashraf, Jinnah University for Women, Pakistan.

(2) Franz Z. Miranda, Institute of Engineering and Applied Technology, Bulacan Agricultural State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Humaira Ashraf, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Franz Z. Miranda, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Overcoming Challenges in Scented Geranium Cultivation, Processing, and Marketing: Study from Northern Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharat Thapa, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

(2) Sanjeet Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharat Thapa, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pricing of Groundwater and Constraints of Farmers in Groundwater Marketing in North Eastern Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Abozar Parhizkari, Payam Noor University, Iran.

(2) Salifu Dumbuya, Pan African University Institute for Water and Energy Science (incl. Climate Change), The Gambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abozar Parhizkari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salifu Dumbuya, The Gambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate Change Adaptation Mechanisms for Smallholder Farmers in Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, University of Western Macedonia, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Debanjali Saha, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) Martin Otundo Richard, JKUAT, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debanjali Saha, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Martin Otundo Richard, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reptiles as Experimental Models: Uncovering Their Role in Drug Development and Health Research

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Prof. Antonio Mastino, University of Messina, Italy And Institute of Translational Pharmacology, National Research Council, Italy.

(3) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mamta Devi Sharma, Shoolini Institute of Life Sciences and Business Management, India.

(2) Mennat-Elrahman Ahmed Fahmy, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Egypt.

(3) Glad Mohesh M. I, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College & RI, India.

(4) Shoebul Haque, King George’s Medical University, India.

(5) Preeti Shanbhag, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mamta Devi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mennat-Elrahman Ahmed Fahmy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Glad Mohesh M. I, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Shoebul Haque, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Preeti Shanbhag, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Multifaceted Soils of Himachal Pradesh, India: Types and Characteristics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sopialena, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Ndokoye Pancras, University of Technology and Arts of Byumba, Rwanda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sopialena, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ndokoye Pancras, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) Using Metroglyph Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kazutoshi Okuno, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kishan Soni, RNB Global University, India.

(2) K. Dharani Sree, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Kishan Soni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Dharani Sree, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA