Peer Review History: Exploring Transgressive Segregation for Enhanced Yield in F2 Segregants of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Dean, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramakrishnaiah T N, M S Ramaiah College of Arts, Science and Commerce, India.

(2) Asit Prasad Dash, S’O’A (DU), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naqib Ullah Khan, University of agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) R.Channakeshava, University of Agricultural Sciences, Indian.

(3) Tushar Arun Mohanty, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramakrishnaiah T N, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asit Prasad Dash, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological Study of Downy Mildew Disease of Opium Poppy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Sharma, College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Daisy Leticia Ramirez Monzón, Paraguay.

(3) Vimla Singh, Maharana Pratap Horticultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankita Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daisy Leticia Ramirez Monzón, Paraguay) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vimla Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Mid-season Moisture Stress on Yield Attributes and Seed Quality in Groundnut Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Boris Boincean, National Centre for Research and Seed Production, Republic of Moldova.

(2) Seyedahmad Kalantarahmadi, Safiabad Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Boris Boincean, Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seyedahmad Kalantarahmadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Interdependent Effects of Agro-input Node Interventions on the Adoption of Cattle milk Production Technologies among Smallholder Farmers in Kericho County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluwafemi Royal Aliu, University of Reading, United Kingdom.

(2) Asfaw Negesse Senbeta, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Ehiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluwafemi Royal Aliu, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asfaw Negesse Senbeta, Ehiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Productivity and Profitability of kharif Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Seedling Age and Nitrogen Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Associate Professor, Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Traore Adama, Université Joseph Ki Zerbo, Burkina Faso.

(2) Rajesh Chintey, Birangana Sati Sadhani Rajyik Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Traore Adama, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh Chintey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative In-vitro Analyses of the Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Properties of Selected Soup Thickeners Commonly Used in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mona Samy Halaby, Helwan University, Egypt.

(2) Omkar S Kamble, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mona Samy Halaby, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Omkar S Kamble, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Market Access on Household Food Consumption Pattern in Imo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, Ourense Campus, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Romen Kalita, Dikhowmukh College, India.

(2) Petros Chavula, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Intan Ria Nirmala, Health Polytechnic of Kendari, Indonesia.

(2) Shikha Saxena, UPES, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Romen Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Petros Chavula, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Teifairia occidentalis and Vernonia amygdalina Supplements on Growth Performance of Clarias gariepinus Fingerlings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Assistant Professor, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Fakunmoju Folajuwon Ajose, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Patrick Ozovehe Samuel, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Waleola Ayo Akinfiresoye , Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fakunmoju Folajuwon Ajose, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Patrick Ozovehe Samuel, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Waleola Ayo Akinfiresoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Laser Biostimulation in Treatment of Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Clinical Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, Assistant Professor, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Siddharth Narayan, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

(2) Shimaa Kotb, Sphinx University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Apoorva Salve, India.

(2) Prince Soni, Govt. College of Dentistry, Indore, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siddharth Narayan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shimaa Kotb, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Non Pharmacological 3: An In-depth Review and Recommendations for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Peripartum Period in Low and Middle Income Countries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

(2) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaidyashiromani Dheeraj Sharma, Patanjali Bhartiya Ayurvigyan Evam Anusandhan Sansthan, India.

(2) Khalid Abdelsamea Mohamedahmed, University of Gezira, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaidyashiromani Dheeraj Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khalid Abdelsamea Mohamedahmed, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA