Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yasushi Shibata, Mito Medical Center, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mayank Rajawat, India.

(2) Karrar Jasim Hamzah, AL-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mayank Rajawat, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karrar Jasim Hamzah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Prasong Srihanam, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Roopa M S, Cutis Academy of Cutaneous Sciences, India.

(2) Deepika Srivastava, Patanjali Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roopa M S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepika Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Galib Ishraq Emran, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

(2) S. L. J. Fernando, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nguyen Dinh Minh, VNU University of Science, Vietnam.

(2) Piratheepa.Vipulan, University of Jaffna, SriLanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Galib Ishraq Emran, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. L. J. Fernando, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Omolara Campbell, Lead City University, Nigeria.

(2) Ofori Frimpong Henneh, Central University of Nicaragua, Nicaragua.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omolara Campbell, Nigeria ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ofori Frimpong Henneh, Nicaragua) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Sibmah Stalin, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, India.

(2) Suman Devi, CCS HAU Hisar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Sibmah Stalin, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suman Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gnanasankaran Natarajan, Thiagarajar College, India.

(2) Digambar Jadhav, Dr.D.Y. Patil Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditi M Joshi, GLS University, India.

(2) Dipankar Das, The Heritage Academy, India.

(3) Eng Khun, Institute of Technology of Cambodia, Cambodia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gnanasankaran Natarajan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Digambar Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Lakhwinder Singh, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Apil Joshi, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prahlad Deb, Visva-Bharati, India.

(2) Riaz Hussain, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 ((Lakhwinder Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Apil Joshi, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dickson Utonga, Tengeru Institute of Community Development, Tanzania.

(2) H S Behera, Lovely Professional University, India.

(3) Uasley Caldas de Oliveira, State University of Mato Grosso, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dickson Utonga, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H S Behera, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Uasley Caldas de Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Saresh N V, Agriculture University Jodhpur, India.

(2) Dhiru Kumar Tiwari, DRPCAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saresh N V, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhiru Kumar Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. José Alberto Duarte Moller, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Grigore Elena, University of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Raji R, Calicut University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Grigore Elena, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raji R, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA