Peer Review History: Frequency of ABO, Rh and Kell Blood Group among Blood Donors in Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maryam Darvish, Assistant Professor, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Science, Arak, Iran.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Kashan Javed, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Praveen N M, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Kashan Javed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Praveen N M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2 v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Non-tipping Tube in Quiescent Water Based on Static Moment Equilibrium

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelouahed Tounsi, University of Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria.

(2) Ryspek Usubamatov, Kyrgyz State Technical University, Kyrgyzstan.

(3) Roberto P.L. Caporali, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdelouahed Tounsi, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ryspek Usubamatov, Kyrgyzstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Roberto P.L. Caporali, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advancements and Challenges in Artificial Intelligence Applications: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, School of Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece..

(2) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

(3) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Manish Kr. Gupta, Buddha Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Punamkumar Hinge, School of Business Management, IIEBM, Indus Business School, India.

(3) Jalaiah Saikam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) DucPhuc Vuong, Vietnam Maritime University, Vietnam.

(2) Ibrahim Majid Mohammed, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manish Kr. Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Punamkumar Hinge, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jalaiah Saikam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Sowing Methods, Weed Management and Growth Promoters on Yield and Quality Behavior of Kharif Maize (Zea mays L)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shweta Singh, College of Biotechnology, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

(2) Jesus G. Rodriguez Diego, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shweta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jesus G. Rodriguez Diego, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fungicides and Bioagents Are Used to Manage Downy Mildew on Pearl Millet

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Amado O. Cortez Jr, College of Agriculture, Isabela State University, Philippines.

(2) Akshit Kukreti, FRI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amado O. Cortez Jr., Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akshit Kukreti, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Effect of Seed Priming Treatments on Yield and Quality of Wheat Seed (Triticum aestivum L.) under Rainfed Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Megersa Bayisa Debelo, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

(2) Apurba Pal, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Megersa Bayisa Debelo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Apurba Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Potash Application on Incidence of Bollworms in Bt Cotton Hybrid

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahendra K R, ICAR-IARI, India.

(2) Wasan Salih Hussain, Mosul University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sheeba Menon, K K Shah Jarodwala Maninagar Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahendra K R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wasan Salih Hussain, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Sowing Windows for Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Sub-temperate Climate of the North-western Himalayas of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

(2) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

(3) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Adnan Khan, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(2) Shivani Kothiyal, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adnan Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivani Kothiyal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Adnan Khan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Shivani Kothiyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Carbon Foot Printing in Sustainable Agriculture as a Cutting-Edge Approach to Environmental Responsibility

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dennis M. Bushnell, USA.

(2) Md. Towhidul Islam, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dennis M. Bushnell, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Towhidul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Barriers to Laminated Film Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities in Engineering Solutions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Tolulope E. Kolajo, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tolulope E. Kolajo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA