Peer Review History: Nursing Strategies in Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Comprehensive Review of Patient-centred Care and Technological Innovation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Coenrad Adolph Groenewald, South Africa.

(2) Shashi Prakash, S. N. Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Coenrad Adolph Groenewald, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shashi Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Propofol Preparations on Injection Pain

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Noha Mohammed Ismael Awad El-Adl, National Research Centre, Cairo.

(2) A Arun Prasad, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noha Mohammed Ismael Awad El-Adl, Cairo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A Arun Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Naturals Dyes from Detarium Microcarpum Guill. and Perr. as Photosensitizers in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A.V. Raghu, Coordinator, BLDE Deemed-to-be University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hardik B Bhatt, SET Science College & PG Centre, BKNMU, India.

(2) S. Ranjitha, Velalar College of  Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hardik B Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Ranjitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Rare Case of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension as the Initial Presentation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Pediatric Patient

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Elsayed Saleh, Zagazig University, Egypt.

(2) Richa Rathoria, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Elsayed Saleh, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Richa Rathoria, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Recent Report on Occurrence of Mites on Commercial Mushrooms in Western Himalayas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Lecturer, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaurav Kothiyal, Himalayiya University, India.

(2) Dibakar Panda, Visva Bharati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaurav Kothiyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dibakar Panda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nature’s Cure: The Role of Botanicals in Integrated Disease Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Chada Anu Reddy, CPGS-AS, CAU, India.

(2) Vineeth M, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chada Anu Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vineeth M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Variability Studies in Oncidium Orchids

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepti Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Zafar Imam, Government Polytechnic College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepti Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zafar Imam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biophysicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasad P, Srinivas Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Basavaraj S Hunasagi, SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Center, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasad P., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basavaraj S Hunasagi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Cluster Front Line Demonstrations (CFLDs) in Summer Green Gram Production in Faridabad District of Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kishan Soni, RNB Global University, India.

(2) C R Anandakumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) N. M. Chaudhari, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.167/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Kishan Soni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C R Anandakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N. M. Chaudhari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Principles and Practices of Zero Budget Natural Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Uma, India.

(2) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aman Abeje, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(2) Hailu Hameso, Hawassa University , Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Uma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA