Peer Review History: Catalogue of Insect Bio-Diversity in High Density Guava after Trash Mulching

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) P U. Igwe, Anambra State University, Nigeria.

(2) Gautam Handique, Tocklai Tea Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rigoberto Alarcon Rojas, Universidad Politecnica Territorial De Merida “Kleber Ramirez” (UPTMKR), Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P U. Igwe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gautam Handique, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Product Arrangement on Sales Performance among Street Vendors in Mwanza, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rao Tahir Anees, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Ravikanthi Sampath Kumar, Indira Gandhi National Open University (I.G.N.O.U.) Central University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Renner, Blessing Awaji-Im, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rao Tahir Anees, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravikanthi Sampath Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Female Undergraduates’ Perception of Feminist Depictions in the Woman King Film

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Renu Bala, CDLU, India.

(2) Marija Glisic Dunovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Renu Bala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marija Glisic Dunovic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Digital Wallet Revolution: Assessing Mobile Money’s Role in Transforming Emerging Economies: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Associate Professor, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) M Swathi, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Mohd Rafiq Sofi, Govt. Degree College Ganderbal, India.

(3) Adam Aloyce Semlambo, Institute of Accountancy Arusha, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Swathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Rafiq Sofi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adam Aloyce Semlambo, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2` | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Coordinated Regulation: Interplay between Ethylene and ABA in Fruit Ripening and Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Carmen Lizette del Toro Sanchez, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Duguma Dibbisa Itana, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

(2) Jesus Aguayo Rojas, Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Duguma Dibbisa Itana, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jesus Aguayo Rojas, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Feed Additives for Layer Chicken Health and Production: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Elsaid Ali Mostafa, Delta University for Science and Technology, Egypt.

(2) Shagufta Iqbal, University of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Stephen Soren, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

(2) Ankit Sharma, School of Veterinary Sciences, Abhilashi University, India.

(3) Nena Villarino Siaboc, Camiguin Polytechnic State College (CPSC), Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Elsaid Ali Mostafa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shagufta Iqbal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Story of the Pink Bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) on Cotton

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, College of Science Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ragab Sebaita Kandil, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Hanan Salah El-Din Taha, Agriculture Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Khumalo, Southern Africa.

(2) Tadele Shiberu, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ragab Sebaita Kandil, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanan Salah El-Din Taha, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Different Levels of Sulphur and Phosphorus on Growth and Productivity of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Komal Bhatt, College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Srijan Samanta, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Komal Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Srijan Samanta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Technology Innovation: A Green Approach to Soil Health

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Jakir Hussain K N, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Navendra Uniyal, Doon Group of Institutions, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jakir Hussain K N, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Navendra Uniyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Evaluation of Crop Transition Patterns in Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Rony Masud, Rikkyo University, Japan.

(2) B V V Balaram Bhagath, Godavari Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Rony Masud, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B V V Balaram Bhagath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA