Peer Review History: Determinants of Human Development Index (HDI): A Regression Analysis of Economic and Social Indicators

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Salaheddine SARI-HASSOUN, University Centre of Maghnia, Algeria.

(2) Nicholas Bamegne Nambie, Valley View University-Ghana, Ghana.

(3) Fashanu Felix Adeniyi, McPherson University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adamu Mulu Ketema, Salale University College of Business and Economics, Ethiopia.

(2) Ofori Frimpong Henneh, Knutsford University College, Ghana.

(3) Onyechege Declan Chibueze, University Putra, Malaysia.

(4) Paulinus Okhumode Ozemede, Bayero University, Nigeria.

(5) Solomon Audu, Caleb University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.83

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salaheddine SARI-HASSOUN, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nicholas Bamegne Nambie, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fashanu Felix Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Patients’ Perceptions of Safety and Efficacy of Herbal and Conventional Type 2 Diabetes Treatments in Nairobi, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Philip lartey, Eastern regional hospital, Ghana.

(2) Shubham Singh, Rai University, India.

(3) S.P. Chaudhary, BHU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Philip lartey, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.P. Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Product Packaging on Consumer Buying Behavior: An Econometric Case Study of Jambo Drinking Water, Nyegezi Ward, Mwanza City, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Karthik Reddy, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Hirenkumar Mistry, Grand Canyon University, USA.

(3) Narsis I, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joy Ndidiamaka Okafor, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Karthik Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hirenkumar Mistry, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narsis I, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioreactor-based Bioremediation of Degreaser-Contaminated Soil: A Study on Microbial Synergy and Nutrient Amendments

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Abdul Hassan Abdul Hai, University of Basrah, Iraq

(2)Aseel Nadhim Al-Salman, University of Basrah, Iraq

(3) Madhavi Pandey, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asmaa Abdul Hassan Abdul Hai, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aseel Nadhim Al-Salman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhavi Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Potato Varieties/Entries Against Common Scab (Streptomyces scabiei) of Potato

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt

(2) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, India

 

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Munawar Fazal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Irrigation, Tillage and Residue Retention on Performance and Economics of Soybean–Wheat Cropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Firdoz Shahana, PJTAU, India

(2) Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, College of Agriculture, Tikrit University, Iraq

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firdoz Shahana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Burden of Burnout Syndrome among Emergency Physicians in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-osMontes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelmajid Qourrichi, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

(2) Aditi Aikat, JIMSH, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdelmajid Qourrichi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditi Aikat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Climate Resilient Technologies in Semi-Arid Regions: Insights from NICRA in Samba District, Jammu and Kashmir in the Shivalik Hills, India

Editor(s):

(1)  Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sneha M, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Fredrick Kayusi, Maasai Mara University, Kenya

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sneha M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fredrick Kayusi, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Plant Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Grown in a Sandy Clay Loam Soil under Pot Experiment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shabana Ehsan, AARI, Pakistan.

(2) Dina Abdulsalam Saad, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vijay Kumar, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Caterina Tomulescu, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shabana Ehsan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dina Abdulsalam Saad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA