Peer Review History: Water-Smart Farming: Strategies, Technologies, and Practices for Smallholder Farmers in a Changing Climate

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Mazhar Iqbal, Pakistan

(2)Hanaa A. Abokoura, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Mazhar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanaa A. Abokoura, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Current Status and Symptomatology of Neem Dieback in Raichur and Yadgir Districts of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bonface O. Manono, Extension Professor, Colorado State University, USA.

(2) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Balagoni Maruthi, Sri Konda Laxman Telangana Horticultural University, India.

(2) Sanjeev Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. M. Khalequzzaman, Bangladesh.

(2) Lellapalli Rithesh, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Balagoni Maruthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjeev Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Study of Service Mesh Implementations in Kubernetes for Multi-cluster Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematical Sciences, Bohai University, Jinzhou, Chin.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahraa A. Jaaz, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(2) Neha Chowdhary, IIT Kharagpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pardeep Kumar, SGT University, India.

(2) M. Venkateswara Rao, Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahraa A. Jaaz, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Chowdhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibiotics Resistance and Abundance of Some Bacteria from Agricultural and Non-agricultural Soil in One of the Most Agriculturally-active Settings in West Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Puvarajan, TANUVAS, India.

(2) Silas Onyango Awuor, Masogo Sub-County Hospital, Kenya.

(3) Kouassi Kra Athanase, Universite Jean Lorognon Guede, Côte d’Ivoire

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dauphin Dighitoghi Moro, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

(2) Fatima Moeen Abbas, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Puvarajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Silas Onyango Awuor, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kouassi Kra Athanase, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Pest Resistance of Hot Pepper Hybrids in Organic Farming Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gopal Krishan, National Institute of Hydrology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Olaomi Adeyemi Afeez, Federal University Lokoja, Nigeria

(2) Frank Yeboah Adusei,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States

(3) Talveer Singh, University of Texas at El Paso, USA

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vedika Sharma, Eternal University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olaomi Adeyemi Afeez, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Frank Yeboah Adusei, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Talveer Singh, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Different Plant Oils against Rice Moth, Corcyra cephalonica, Stainton in Stored Groundnut Kernels

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Jagarlamudi Nethra, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, India.

(2) Durgesh Kailas Narwade, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Sahar Sharkawy Abdallah Ahmed Sharkawy, Plant Pathology Institute Researcher, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jagarlamudi Nethra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Durgesh Kailas Narwade, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sahar Sharkawy Abdallah Ahmed Sharkawy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Floral Biology and Pollination Behaviour in Bottle Gourd under Hilly Condition of Uttarakhand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Elamin Ali Ahmed, University of Gezira, Sudan.

(2) Chava Asritha, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A J Solomon Raju, Andhra University, India.

(2) Meena Wankhade, VNMKV, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elamin Ali Ahmed, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chava Asritha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Awareness of Surgical Hazard Risks amongst Final-Year Medical Students in Enugu State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Sinisa Franjic, Europe.

(2) Wajiha Hameed, Lahore School of Nursing, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maurice B. Silali, Mount Kigali University, Rwanda.

(2) Syed Sikandar Shah, RAK Medical and Health Science University, United Arab Emirates.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sinisa Franjic, Europe) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wajiha Hameed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Trace Metal Contamination of Cocoa Soils Resulting from Illegal Gold Panning in Central West Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Shafiq, University of Karachi, Pakistan

(2) Tsegaye Fekadu Egza, Arbaminch University, Ethiopia

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Shafiq, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tsegaye Fekadu Egza, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Soybean Genotypes in Kharif Season of Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nese Yilmaz, Associate Professor, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Owayes M. Hamed, Iraq.

(2) Arvind Kumar, AISECT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Owayes M. Hamed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arvind Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2