Peer Review History: Farmers’ Purchasing Behaviour of Insecticides in Cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and Problems Faced by Farmers for Cumin in Dhrol Taluka of Jamnagar District, Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Agrochemical Research Center, Federal Scientific Center of Vegetable Production, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Risper B. Nyairo, UW, USA.

(2) Ikram Hasan, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lola Kurnia Pitaloka, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia.

(2) Mayura Kathane, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jussara Aparecida de Oliveira Cotta, University of the State of Minas Gerais (UEMG), Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Risper B. Nyairo, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ikram Hasan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exercise and Weight Loss as a Strategy for Chronic Pain Control: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E. Umit Bagriacik, Gazi University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinaya Kumary. T, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

(2) Marvel Reuben Suwitono, Universitas Advent Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rubeena Gul, Khyber Medical College, Pakistan.

(2) Tejinder Kaur, Panjab University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vinaya Kumary. T, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marvel Reuben Suwitono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Penetrating Stab Wounds of the Spine: Two Cases and Review of the Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nitin N. Jagdhane, Dr D Y Patil Medical College, India.

(2) Koka Gogichashvili, Caucasus Medical Centre, Georgia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nitin N. Jagdhane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Koka Gogichashvili, Georgia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Healthcare Workers from the Three Teaching Hospitals in Abidjan (Cote D’ivoire) during Pandemic Waves of 2022

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Cynthia Aracely Alvizo Baez, Professor, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Concordia, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Nageen Hussain, Pakistan.

(2) Magesh Sachidanandam, King Institute of Preventive Medicine and Research, India.

(3) Vahid Nasiri, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Iran.

(4) Maab I. AL- Farwachi, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahasan Ullah Kham, Mymensingh Commerce Collage, Bangladesh.

(2) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Deepti Tomar, Govt. Degree College, Nainpur, India.

(2) R Kesavan, Sri Lanka.

(3) Stan Florin Gheorghe, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary  Medicine, Romania.

(4) Sunil Malhar Kulkarni, BVDU, College of Nursing, India.

(5) Suyog Sindhu, KGMU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.92/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nageen Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Magesh Sachidanandam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Vahid Nasiri, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Maab I. AL- Farwachi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural Extension’s Key Role in Modern Farming: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) B. K Sikka, College of Agribusiness Management, G B Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Ailene B. Anonuevo, Philippines.

(3) Pitti Jacob, University of Cordoba, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Frederico Denardi, Brazil.

(2) Irena Nikaj, University Fan Noli, Albania.

(3) Maurice Manyonge Pepela, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (B. K Sikka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ailene B. Anonuevo, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Pitti Jacob, Spain) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro and In-silico Inhibitory Action of Methanol Extract of Rhynchosia beddomei Whole Plant on α-Glucosidase and α-Amylase

Editor(s):.

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, College of Science, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Osvaldo Garrido Acosta, UNAM, Mexico.

(3) Nidhal Mohammed Salih AL-Janabi, Baghdad University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Osvaldo Garrido Acosta, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nidhal Mohammed Salih AL-Janabi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constitutional and Institutional Governance of Electricity Sector in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Huan-Liang Tsai, Professor, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Raheel Muzzammel, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Aaron Don M. Africa, De La Salle University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bilal Abdullah Nasir, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Bozena Gajdzik, Silesian University of Technology, Poland.

(3) Liao Zhigao, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, China.

(4) L. O. Agberegha, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Nigeria.

(5) Mallikarjun G Hudedmani, Visveshwaraiya Technological University, India.

(6) Twizerimana Maurice, Moi University, Rwanda.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raheel Muzzammel, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aaron Don M. Africa, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Rate of Area Production and Productivity of Litchi Fruit in Jashpur District of Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Swapnil Pandey, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yehia Abd EL-Rahman Yehia, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, University of Bahri, Sudan.

(2) Jeff Lamptey, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia.

(3) Jalal Uddin Sarder, Rajshahi University, Bangladesh.

(4) Tariq Hattab Y. Al-Maliky, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Swapnil Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yehia Abd EL-Rahman Yehia, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Urgency Index and Preoperative Index: Prediction of Anastomotic Leakage in Patients Operated For Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Assistance Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Iskra Ventseslavova Sainova, Institute of Experimental Morphology, Pathology and Anthropology with Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(2) Zainab Mahmood Aljammali, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(3) Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hany Samy Attallah, International Medical Centre, Egypt.

(2) Moayad Aziz Alabdaly, Al- Noor University College, Iraq.

(3) Julian E. Losanoff MD FACS, University of Nevada Las Vegas and VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Miricescu Daniela, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Iskra Ventseslavova Sainova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zainab Mahmood Aljammali, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Precision Medicine Approaches for Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Professor, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Smitha Parameswaran Namboothiri, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

(2) Purushothaman Padmanabhan, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amipara M D, GTU, India.

(2) Beydolah Shahouzehi, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) C. L. Avadhani, Annamalai University, India.

(4) Jose Ignacio Fernandez Montequin, National Institute of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Cuba.

(5) Apt. Kosasih, Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia.

(6) Luana de Oliveira Hernandes, Brazil.

(7) Nihad Abdallah Selman, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(8) Tayo Julius Bogunjoko, Eye Foundation Hospital Group, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Fakhria  Jaber  Muhaibes, Al Mustaqbel University, Iraq.

(2) Purnima Meher, VIMSAR, Jyoti Vihar University, India.

(3) Sukhraj Kaur, Government Medical College, India.

(4) Tahrir Etihad Kadium, Alkindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(5) Yasir Haider Al-Mawlah, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Smitha Parameswaran Namboothiri, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Purushothaman Padmanabhan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA