Peer Review History: Simulation and Optimization of Bio-Methanol Production from Steam Gasification of Sugarcane Bagasse Using Aspen Plus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Ghana.

(2) Kodchasorn Hussaro, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(3) Adebobola Taofeek Olanrewaju, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Srinivasan, Dr.Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Deepak KB, Vivekananda College of Engineering & Technology, India.

(3) G.Senthil Kumar, Periyar University, India.

(4) Keith Openshaw, Sokoine Univ. Tanzania, USA.

(5) Murat Aydin, Adıyaman University, Turkiye.

(6) Rajesh Kumar, Maa Sheetala Devi Trijugi Narayan Mahila Mahavidalya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Johnson Oluyemi Ojosu, Nigeria.

(2) Amina Msonga, Mkwawa University College of Education, University of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.

(3) Mohammed Saber Gad, Fayoum University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kodchasorn Hussaro, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Adebobola Taofeek Olanrewaju, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dengue Fever: Etiology, Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bagiu Iulia-Cristina, Assistant Professor, ”Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Tadesse Duguma, Mizan-Tepi University, Ethiopia.

(2) M. Shabnum, Katuri Medical College & Hospital, India.

(3) Minakshi Bhat, Terna Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adegbite Gbenga Aduagbemi, Covenant University, Nigeria.

(2) Syam Sundar Junapudi, GMC, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Agnes Adom-Konadu, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

(2) Chimere Agomo, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tadesse Duguma, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. Shabnum, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Minakshi Bhat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unveiling the Rarity: A Comprehensive Report on Cementoblastoma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Izaz Shaik, Associate dentist, Lakewood Family Dental IL, United States.

Reviewers:

(1) R. S. Pavithra, Tamilnadu Dr.MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Wan Muhamad Amir Bin W Ahmad, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deval Kumar Arora, Government Medical College Shahjahanpur (U.P.), India.

(2) Eugenia Henriquez-D’Aquino, University of Chile, Chile.

(3) Fanny Margaretha Laihad, Hang Tuah University, Indonesia.

(4) Kapil Kshirsagar, D Y Patil Dental School, India.

(5) Nalini Doppalapudi, USA.

(6) V. S. N. Vithanaarachchi, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Provatas Ioannis, General State Hospital of Nikaia, Greece.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (R. S. Pavithra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wan Muhamad Amir Bin W Ahmad, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Photosynthetic Bacteria, Vermiwash and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Işın Onur, Turkey.

(2) Pablo Huerta Fernández, La Molina National Agrarian University, Perú.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dobrin Aurora, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Işın Onur, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pablo Huerta Fernández, Perú) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Seed Yield and Quality under Different Planting Systems in Rice (Oryza sativa. L)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Lambat, Sevadal Mahila Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Himanshu Tiwari, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avelina M. Aquino, Bulacan State University, Philippines.

(2) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré – UNIVC, Brazil.

(3) K. Selvarani, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, India.

(4) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(5) Naú Silverio Niño Gutiérrez, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Mexico.

(6) Vishal Vilasrao Naiknaware, Swa. Sawarkar College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amit A. Shahne, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Jan Barwicki, Institute of Technology and Life Science, Poland.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ashish Lambat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Himanshu Tiwari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of the Effect of Two Extraction Solvents on Polyphenols Content and Antioxidant Activity of Alstonia Boonei Bark

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung Cheal Moon, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon, Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Thitiphan Chimsook, Maejo University, Thailand.

(2) Lilian Rumi Tsuruta, Butantan Institute, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rezza Ruzuqi, Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic of Sorong, Indonesia.

(2) Wafai Z. A. Mikhail, Cairo University, Egypt.

(3) Zakia Bouzoubaâ, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Thitiphan Chimsook, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lilian Rumi Tsuruta, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Negative Appendectomy Rates -Current Prospective- A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Associate Profressor, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA

And Professor William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba.

(2) Harris Jinazali, University of Livingstonia, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Małgorzata Stachoń, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Poland.

(2) Sujan Narayan Agrawal, Government district Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rakhi More, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, India.

(2) Shrirang S Yadwadkar, Fortis Hospital Mulund, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Harris Jinazali, Malawi) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Structural Relationship Model of Communicative Competence

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bei Lyu, Associate Professor, Huaibei Normal University of China And Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand.

(2) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(3) Dr. E. Seda Koc, Associate Professor, Vocational School of Health Sciences, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) T S Arulananth, JNTUH, India.

(2) Hiroko Kanoh, National University Corporation Yamagata University, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T S Arulananth, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hiroko Kanoh, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Can Elementary Particles have Excited States

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pratima Parashar Pandey, Professor, College of Engineering & technology, Integrated Institutes of Learning, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, Greater Noida, India.

(2) Dr. Abbas Mohammed, Professor, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Rajendra Prasad, Kamala Institute of Technology & Science, India.

(2) Akram Mohammed Ali, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(3) Wan Nasarudin Bin Wan Jalal, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Ramalingam, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Rajendra Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Akram Mohammed Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Wan Nasarudin Bin Wan Jalal, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design of (3,2) and (4,2) CNTFET Ternary Counters for Multipliers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulrazak Tijjani, Bayero University, Nigeria.

(2) Kasturi Vasudevan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdulrazak Tijjani, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kasturi Vasudevan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA