Peer Review History: Inductive Cum Target Yield Model Based Fertilizer Prescription for Chickpea Cultivation in North Western Mollisol

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Universidade Paulista, Brazil.

(2) B N Hazarika, CAU, India.

(3) Jawadayn Talib Alkooranee, Wasit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (B N Hazarika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jawadayn Talib Alkooranee, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Physical, Chemical and Sensory Properties of Multigrain Cookies Prepared Using Wheat, Oats and Barley Flours

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mariola Kozłowska, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Institute of Food Sciences, Poland.

(2) Mari Silvia Rodrigues de Oliveira, Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mariola Kozłowska, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mari Silvia Rodrigues de Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rediscovery of Common Bean Landraces in Tribal Regions of Balaghat (MP), India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(3) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Esameldin B. M. Kabbashi, National Food Research Centre, Sudan.

(2) Taís Ferreira De Almeida, Goiás State University, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Esameldin B. M. Kabbashi, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Taís Ferreira De Almeida, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Construction of a Knowledge Test to Assess Rubber Growers’ Knowledge of Rubber Plantation Development and Extension Schemes in North East India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tran Huu Ai, Van Hien University, Vitenam.

(2) Ruchira Shukla, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Verma, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University of Social Sciences, India.

(2) José Manuel Salum Tomé, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Chile.

(3) Paul Mwari Maina, Kenya.

(4) Sehonou Jean, University of Abomey Calavi, Republic of Benin.

(5) Deepak Vikhe, Pravara institute of medical sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tran Huu Ai, Vitenam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ruchira Shukla, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutrient Content, Nutrient Uptake and Soil Nutrient Status of Baby Corn as Influenced by Varieties and Levels of Fertilizers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) U V Singh, India.

(2) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(3) Aliva Patnaik, Sambalpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gitanjali Jothiprakash, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Andy Bhermana, National Research And Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

(3) A. Senthilkumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(4) Youssef Ahmed Mahmoud, Agricultural and Biological Institution, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (U V Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dwi Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Aliva Patnaik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization and Classification of Sugarcane Growing Soil of Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

(2) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Isin Onur, Akdeniz University, Turkey.

(2) Shoukat Ali Shah, Wuhan University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Isin Onur, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shoukat Ali Shah, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Recruitment Technology Implementation: A Study of Select Companies in Yadadri Bhuvanagiri Dist. of Telangana State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria-Dolores Guillamon, University of Murcia, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Glenford C. Franca, Southern Philippines Agri-Business and Marine and Aquatic School of Technology, Philippines.

(2) Luiz Roberto Nascimento, ENS-Brazilian School of Insurance, Brazil.

(3) Elisha, Otekenari David, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhabani Shankar Dash, Dr Ambedkar Memorial Institute of IT & Mgt. Science, India.

(2) Bijan Yavar, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(3) Moustafa Sobhy Mahmoud Abo El Nile, October 6 Univrsity, Egypt.

(4) Rupesh Rastogi, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

(5) Vicente Humberto Monteverde, University of Moron, Argentina.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Glenford C. Franca, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luiz Roberto Nascimento, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Elisha, Otekenari David, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Thermosensitive Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasir Q. Almajidi, Baghdad College of Medical Sciences, Iraq.

(2) Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, IUT, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yasir Q. Almajidi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mapping of Aquifer Potential in the Northeast Basement Rock of Burkina Faso: Using Remote Sensing and Geophysical Methods

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Miaoli, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Paraskevas Charalampos, Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology, Centre for Research and Technology of Hellas, Greece.

(2) Nordiana Mohd Muztaza, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Paraskevas Charalampos, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nordiana Mohd Muztaza, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Ratio and Loss Analysis for a Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic System: Case of the 7MW Plant in Malbaza, Niger

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bojan Durin, Associate Professor, University North, Varaždin, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayong Hiendro, Tanjungpura University, Indonesia.

(2) T. Sundar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ayong Hiendro, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (T. Sundar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA