Peer Review History: Enhancing Agricultural Water Efficiency through Conservation and Groundwater Management in Akola District, Vidarbha Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharmila A, Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, India.

(2) Florante D. Poso, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Philippines.

(3) George-Best Azuoko, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aniruddh Vijay, School of Open Learning, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Kumari Akanksha, Birla Institute of Technology Mesra, India.

(3) Mohammed Elyaagoubi, Morocco.

(4) V. Pragadeesh Raja, Father Muller Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharmila A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Florante D. Poso, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (George-Best Azuoko, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Redefining School Curriculum through the Lens of P. R. Sarkar’s Neo-Humanism

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shambhavi Kumari, Training College, Purnea, India.

(2) Syed Jawad Zareen Shah, University of Poonch, Pakistan.

(3) Gopalbhai B Bharvad, Sardar Patel University, Anand, Gujarat, India.

(4) Jayson S. Ayon, Antique National School, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shambhavi Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Jawad Zareen Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gopalbhai B Bharvad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jayson S. Ayon, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community Analysis of Plant Parasitic Nematodes in the Rhizosphere of Vegetable Crops in Jorhat, Assam

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Arun A, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yeo Gnenakan, Centre National de Recherche Agronomique, Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arun A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yeo Gnenakan, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Management of Wilt Disease of Sugarcane Through Optimization of Chemical Fungicides

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) N.H. Shankar Reddy, Kadiri Baburao College of Agriculture, India.

(2) R. Premalatha, CMS College of Science and Commerce, Coimbatore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N.H. Shankar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Premalatha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dynamics of Communicable and Non-Communicable Health Shocks in the Campo Ma’an National Park: Implications on Natural Resources Dependent Livelihoods

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Michael Olabode Tomori, Texila American University, Nigeria.

(2) Dorna Abdolkhani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Caroline Ly, US.

(4) Ashefet Agete Mengste, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Michael Olabode Tomori, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dorna Abdolkhani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Caroline Ly, US) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ashefet Agete Mengste, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Management from Source to Plot in the Aneker Irrigated Area Within Dysfunction and Proposed Solutions, Niger, Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, Associated Professor, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulkareem Ibrahim Ayinla, Kaduna Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Azizz Mazian, University of Hassan II Mohammedia Casablanca, Morocco.

(3) Bhabani Shankar Das, National Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdulkareem Ibrahim Ayinla, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Azizz Mazian, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bhabani Shankar Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Screening of Botanicals, Bio-Agents and Fungicides against Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler, Causing Brinjal Blight Disease

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Emani Rajeswari, Acharya  N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sanjeev Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emani Rajeswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjeev Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Flavonoids, Breast Cancer Prevention, and Its Treatment: A Growing Evidence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana, Associate Professor, Dr. Moewardi General teaching Hospital, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Evy Sulistyoningrum, Islamic University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Kayode Raheem, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States of America.

(3) Manjusha Goraksh Baravkar, School of Pharmacy & Research Centre,Baramatic.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Evy Sulistyoningrum, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kayode Raheem, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manjusha Goraksh Baravkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis and Comparison of the Defocus Curve of the Most Used Premium Intraocular Trifocal Lenses in Brazil: A Systematic Literature Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Zoran Todorovic, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade and University Medical Center “Bezanijska Kosa”, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit S. Varshney, Shree Bharatimaiya College of Optometry, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

(2) Ştefan Ţălu, The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankit S. Varshney, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ştefan Ţălu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mindfulness Meditation: A Hellenic Perspective Through Quantitative and Qualitative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E. Umit Bagriacik, Gazi University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Mahdi Marvi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Mariane Lima DeSouza, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Brasil.

(3) Sathishkumar S., Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Mahdi Marvi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mariane Lima DeSouza, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sathishkumar S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA