Peer Review History: Comparison of Three Diagnostic Methods for Trichomonas vaginalis Detection in a Low-Resource Setting

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maysoon Abdul Zahra Merdaw, University of Baghdad, College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

(2) Majid Mohammed Mahmood, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atef Darwish, Egypt.

(2) H. I. Abdullahi, Nigeria.

(3) Mufareh Asiri, King Saud Medical City, Saudi Arabia.

(4) Cirimbei Ciprian, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Romania.

(5) Seble Tiku Ayka, Ethiopian Police University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maysoon Abdul Zahra Merdaw, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Majid Mohammed Mahmood, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Haematological and Hepatorenal Alterations Induced by Potash (Akanwu) on Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) S. K. Maurya, College of Veterinary Science, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Haider Mohammed  Majeed, University of Baghdad, College of Nursing, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanaa A. El–Hallwany, Animal Reproduction Research Institute (A.R.R.I.), Egypt.

(2) Yanitsa Davidkova, Bulgaria.

(3) Athraa Y. Al-hijazi, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. K. Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Haider Mohammed Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Beyond the Hashtags: Constructs of Political Science Students on Social Media as a Form of Justice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Popoviciu Gabriela-Argentina, University of Oradea, Romania.

(2) Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(3) Maryam Shamsaei, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Constantinos Nicolaou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(2) Lim Seng Poh, Penang Matriculation College, Malaysia.

(3) Mohammed Eldaghmah, Naïf Arab University for Security Sciences, Saudi Arabia.

(4) Pasupuleti Venkata Siva Kumar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Popoviciu Gabriela-Argentina, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maryam Shamsaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibacterial Activities of Extracts from four Wild Food Fruits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrunalini R Kanvinde, D Y Patil Medical College, India.

(2) Irena Maliszewska, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland.

(3) A. Sreedevi, Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amer J.Jarad, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Michel Shengo Lutandula, University of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo.

(3) N. C. J. Packia Lekshmi, India.

(4) Simone Sacramento Valverde, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mrunalini R Kanvinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Irena Maliszewska, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (A. Sreedevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Post-mortem Processing Methods on Quality and Shelf Life of Mutton

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kurniasih Sukenti, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

(2) Manish Kumar Maurya, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kgantjie W. Moloto, South Africa.

(2) Bonou Assouan Gabriel, National Institute of Agricultural Research of Benin, Benin.

(3) Patience Olusola Fakolade, Osun State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kurniasih Sukenti, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Manish Kumar Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-demographic and Clinical Profile of Children and Adolescents Attending the Psychiatry Outpatient Service of a Tertiary Level Hospital in Eastern Nepal

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Assistance Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA and University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA And William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vira Shuper, Bukovinian State Medical University, Ukraine.

(2) Bahareh Shateri Amiri, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vira Shuper, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bahareh Shateri Amiri, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spectral Response of a Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cell: Under the Influence of the Variation of the Refractive Indices of the Antireflection Materials

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lei Zhang, Winston-Salem State University, North Carolina, USA.

(2) Dr. Roberto Oscar Aquilano, National University of Rosario (UNR), Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Tazdik Patwary Plateau, Missouri University of Science and Technology, United States.

(2) Mohammed Tayeb Meftah, Université Kasdi Merbah, Algérie.

(3) Abhigyan Ganguly, Dr. Sudhir Chandra Sur Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Musaab Khudhur Mohammed, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Naorem  Santakrus  Singh, University of Delhi, India.

(3) Shuchi Tiwari, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(4) S.Rajendra Prasad, Kamala Institute of Technology and Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tazdik Patwary Plateau, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammed Tayeb Meftah, Algérie) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Abhigyan Ganguly, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Differences in Cardiovascular Remodeling in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francesco Pelliccia, Professor, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajeev Srivastava, Venkateshwar Hospital, India.

(2) Samir Morcos Rafla, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Reza Bakhshandeh, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Essoh Ayimba, Université de Lomé, Togo.

(3) Peter Uduagbamen, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(4) Sudhir L.Tungikar, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(5) Sumit Mohan, Dental College, RIMS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rajeev Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Samir Morcos Rafla, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Watershed Development Programme in Prakasam District of Andhra Pradesh Using Remote Sensing and GIS Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Khoshkonesh, Birkbeck University of London, United Kingdom.

(2) Vasudha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Isaac Sarfo, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alireza Khoshkonesh, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vasudha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation, Characterization and Anti-Pepsin (HIV-Protease) Activity of Vernonia amygdalina Del and Cymbopogon citratus (de Condole) Stapf

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fahmida Khan, National Institute of Technology Raipur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sonia Sharma, Khalsa College, India.

(2) Sabira Sultana, Government College University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Victoria Ngozi  Mokwenye, Igbinedion University Okada, Nigeria.

(2) Aditi Munmun Sengupta, University of Calcutta and CMRI Hospital, India.

(3) Atiyeh Rezaei, Shahid Beheshi University of Medical Science, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(4) Navneet Kumar Verma, Buddha Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sonia Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sabira Sultana, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA